• Source: Argument to moderation

Argument to moderation (Latin: argumentum ad temperantiam)—also known as the false compromise, argument from middle ground, fallacy of gray, middle ground fallacy, or golden mean fallacy—is the fallacy that the truth is always in the middle of two opposites.
It does not necessarily suggest that an argument for the middle solution or for a compromise is always fallacious, but rather applies primarily in cases where such a position is ill-informed, unfeasible, or impossible, or where an argument is incorrectly made that a position is correct simply because it is in the middle.
An example of an argument to moderation would be considering two statements about the colour of the sky on Earth during the day – one claiming, correctly, that the sky is blue, and another claiming that it is yellow – and incorrectly concluding that the sky is the intermediate colour, green.




See also






References

Kata Kunci Pencarian:

• Keseimbangan palsu
• Argumen untuk moderasi
• Argument to moderation
• Appeal to tradition
• Argument from fallacy
• Argumentum ad populum
• Straw man
• Argument from ignorance
• List of fallacies
• Overton window
• Argument from authority
• Circular reasoning