Comparison of programming languages (algebraic data type) GudangMovies21 Rebahinxxi LK21

    This article compares the syntax for defining and instantiating an algebraic data type (ADT), sometimes also referred to as a tagged union, in various programming languages.


    Examples of algebraic data types




    = ATS

    =

    In ATS, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:

    Additionally in ATS dataviewtypes are the linear type version of ADTs for the purpose of providing in the setting of manual memory management with the convenience of pattern matching. An example program might look like:


    = Ceylon

    =

    In Ceylon, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    = Clean

    =

    In Clean, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    = Coq

    =

    In Coq, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    = C++

    =

    In C++, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    = Dart

    =

    In Dart, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    = Elm

    =

    In Elm, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    = F#

    =

    In F#, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    = F*

    =

    In F*, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    = Free Pascal

    =

    In Free Pascal (in standard ISO Pascal mode), an ADT may be defined with variant records:

    And instantiated as:


    = Haskell

    =

    In Haskell, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    = Haxe

    =

    In Haxe, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    = Hope

    =

    In Hope, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    = Idris

    =

    In Idris, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    = Java

    =

    In Java, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    = Julia

    =

    In Julia, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    = Kotlin

    =

    In Kotlin, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    = Limbo

    =

    In Limbo, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    = Mercury

    =

    In Mercury, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    = Miranda

    =

    In Miranda, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    = Nemerle

    =

    In Nemerle, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    = Nim

    =

    In Nim, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    = OCaml

    =

    In OCaml, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    = Opa

    =

    In Opa, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    = OpenCog

    =

    In OpenCog, an ADT may be defined with:


    = PureScript

    =

    In PureScript, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    = Python

    =

    In Python, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    = Racket

    =

    In Typed Racket, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    = Reason

    =


    Reason


    In Reason, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    ReScript


    In ReScript, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    = Rust

    =

    In Rust, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    = Scala

    =


    Scala 2


    In Scala 2, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    Scala 3


    In Scala 3, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    = Standard ML

    =

    In Standard ML, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    = Swift

    =

    In Swift, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    = TypeScript

    =

    In TypeScript, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    = Visual Prolog

    =

    In Visual Prolog, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    = Zig

    =

    In Zig, an ADT may be defined with:

    And instantiated as:


    References

Kata Kunci Pencarian:

Search Results

comparison of programming languages algebraic data type

Daftar Isi

Comparison of programming languages (algebraic data type)

This article compares the syntax for defining and instantiating an algebraic data type (ADT), sometimes also referred to as a tagged union, in various programming languages.

Algebraic data type - Wikipedia

In computer programming, especially functional programming and type theory, an algebraic data type (ADT) is a kind of composite data type, i.e., a data type formed by combining other types. Two common classes of algebraic types are product types (i.e., tuples, and records) and sum types (i.e., tagged or disjoint unions, coproduct types or ...

Algebraic Data Types in four languages | by Marcin Baraniecki

Oct 24, 2018 · In this blog post, I’m going to compare how the concept of “sum” algebraic data types is supported by four languages I use, namely: Haskell, Scala, Rust, and TypeScript. We’ll see how concise the syntax of these can be, and how much of …

Comparison of programming languages - Wikipedia

Notable standardized programming languages include ALGOL, C, C++, JavaScript (under the name ECMAScript), Smalltalk, Prolog, Common Lisp, Scheme (IEEE standard), ISLISP, Ada, Fortran, COBOL, SQL, and XQuery. The following table compares general and technical information for a selection of commonly used programming languages.

Comparison of programming languages (algebraic data type

This article compares the syntax for defining and instantiating an algebraic data type (ADT), sometimes also referred to as a tagged union, in various programming languages.

Comparison of Type Systems in Front-end Languages: Algebraic data types ...

Sep 7, 2022 · Two common classes of algebraic types are product types (a product, also known as a tuple, or a record, which is just a special case of a record) and sum types (disjointed or disjunctive unions, variant-type.) So, the type algebra is about creating some composite types based on a more primitive one with the help of allowed operators.

Lecture 21 – Algebraic Data Types (1) - COSE212: …

Many functional languages support algebraic data types: •Scala enumTree { Leaf(v: Int), Node(l: Tree, v: Int, r: Tree) } •Haskell dataTree = Leaf Int | Node Tree Int Tree •Rust enumTree { Leaf(i32), Node(Tree, i32, Tree) } •OCaml typetree = Leafofint | Nodeoftree * int * tree •...

Algebraic data types outside of functional languages?

Oct 19, 2010 · Which languages that are not solely functional have algebraic data types (or something similar) and pattern matching? I'm also interested in multi-paradigm languages - I know that Ocaml and F# are ML dialects with OO added, …

Java Pattern: Algebraic Data Types - garciat

May 7, 2020 · Algebraic Data Types (ADTs) are product types and sum types, usually in combination. "Product type" is just a fancy name for struct or record. Here's a product type in Java: boolean bold; Font font; // where public enum Font { SERIF, SANS_SERIF, MONOSPACE }

What is an Algebraic Data Type (ADT)? - Stack Overflow

Jul 9, 2017 · In Wikipedia, it's only said that: an algebraic data type is a kind of composite type, i.e., a type formed by combining other types. Two common classes of algebraic types are product types (i.e., tuples and records) and sum types (i.e. tagged or disjoint unions, or variant types). But no formal definition is given.