- Source: Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation
Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that, in a suit raising non-federal claims against a foreign state or instrumentality under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, a court should determine the substantive law by using the same choice-of-law rule applicable in a similar suit against a private party.
References
External links
Text of Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation, No. 20-1566, 596 U.S. ___ (2022) is available from: Justia
This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain. "[T]he Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court." Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591, 668 (1834)
Kata Kunci Pencarian:
- Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation
- Frances Lasker Brody
- Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
- Julius Cassirer
- Frank Perls
- Paul Cassirer
- 2021 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States
- Rue Saint-Honoré, dans l'après-midi. Effet de pluie
- List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Roberts Court
- 2021 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Elena Kagan
