- Source: Dirichlet convolution
In mathematics, the Dirichlet convolution (or divisor convolution) is a binary operation defined for arithmetic functions; it is important in number theory. It was developed by Peter Gustav Lejeune Dirichlet.
Definition
If
f
,
g
:
N
→
C
{\displaystyle f,g:\mathbb {N} \to \mathbb {C} }
are two arithmetic functions from the positive integers to the complex numbers, the Dirichlet convolution f ∗ g is a new arithmetic function defined by:
(
f
∗
g
)
(
n
)
=
∑
d
∣
n
f
(
d
)
g
(
n
d
)
=
∑
a
b
=
n
f
(
a
)
g
(
b
)
{\displaystyle (f*g)(n)\ =\ \sum _{d\,\mid \,n}f(d)\,g\!\left({\frac {n}{d}}\right)\ =\ \sum _{ab\,=\,n}\!f(a)\,g(b)}
where the sum extends over all positive divisors d of n, or equivalently over all distinct pairs (a, b) of positive integers whose product is n.
This product occurs naturally in the study of Dirichlet series such as the Riemann zeta function. It describes the multiplication of two Dirichlet series in terms of their coefficients:
(
∑
n
≥
1
f
(
n
)
n
s
)
(
∑
n
≥
1
g
(
n
)
n
s
)
=
(
∑
n
≥
1
(
f
∗
g
)
(
n
)
n
s
)
.
{\displaystyle \left(\sum _{n\geq 1}{\frac {f(n)}{n^{s}}}\right)\left(\sum _{n\geq 1}{\frac {g(n)}{n^{s}}}\right)\ =\ \left(\sum _{n\geq 1}{\frac {(f*g)(n)}{n^{s}}}\right).}
Properties
The set of arithmetic functions forms a commutative ring, the Dirichlet ring, under pointwise addition, where f + g is defined by (f + g)(n) = f(n) + g(n), and Dirichlet convolution. The multiplicative identity is the unit function ε defined by ε(n) = 1 if n = 1 and ε(n) = 0 if n > 1. The units (invertible elements) of this ring are the arithmetic functions f with f(1) ≠ 0.
Specifically, Dirichlet convolution is associative,
(
f
∗
g
)
∗
h
=
f
∗
(
g
∗
h
)
,
{\displaystyle (f*g)*h=f*(g*h),}
distributive over addition
f
∗
(
g
+
h
)
=
f
∗
g
+
f
∗
h
{\displaystyle f*(g+h)=f*g+f*h}
,
commutative,
f
∗
g
=
g
∗
f
{\displaystyle f*g=g*f}
,
and has an identity element,
f
∗
ε
{\displaystyle f*\varepsilon }
=
ε
∗
f
=
f
{\displaystyle \varepsilon *f=f}
.
Furthermore, for each
f
{\displaystyle f}
having
f
(
1
)
≠
0
{\displaystyle f(1)\neq 0}
, there exists an arithmetic function
f
−
1
{\displaystyle f^{-1}}
with
f
∗
f
−
1
=
ε
{\displaystyle f*f^{-1}=\varepsilon }
, called the Dirichlet inverse of
f
{\displaystyle f}
.
The Dirichlet convolution of two multiplicative functions is again multiplicative, and every not constantly zero multiplicative function has a Dirichlet inverse which is also multiplicative. In other words, multiplicative functions form a subgroup of the group of invertible elements of the Dirichlet ring. Beware however that the sum of two multiplicative functions is not multiplicative (since
(
f
+
g
)
(
1
)
=
f
(
1
)
+
g
(
1
)
=
2
≠
1
{\displaystyle (f+g)(1)=f(1)+g(1)=2\neq 1}
), so the subset of multiplicative functions is not a subring of the Dirichlet ring. The article on multiplicative functions lists several convolution relations among important multiplicative functions.
Another operation on arithmetic functions is pointwise multiplication: fg is defined by (fg)(n) = f(n) g(n). Given a completely multiplicative function
h
{\displaystyle h}
, pointwise multiplication by
h
{\displaystyle h}
distributes over Dirichlet convolution:
(
f
∗
g
)
h
=
(
f
h
)
∗
(
g
h
)
{\displaystyle (f*g)h=(fh)*(gh)}
. The convolution of two completely multiplicative functions is multiplicative, but not necessarily completely multiplicative.
Properties and examples
In these formulas, we use the following arithmetical functions:
ε
{\displaystyle \varepsilon }
is the multiplicative identity:
ε
(
1
)
=
1
{\displaystyle \varepsilon (1)=1}
, otherwise 0 (
ε
(
n
)
=
⌊
1
n
⌋
{\displaystyle \varepsilon (n)=\lfloor {\tfrac {1}{n}}\rfloor }
).
1
{\displaystyle 1}
is the constant function with value 1:
1
(
n
)
=
1
{\displaystyle 1(n)=1}
for all
n
{\displaystyle n}
. Keep in mind that
1
{\displaystyle 1}
is not the identity. (Some authors denote this as
ζ
{\displaystyle \zeta }
because the associated Dirichlet series is the Riemann zeta function.)
1
C
{\displaystyle 1_{C}}
for
C
⊂
N
{\displaystyle C\subset \mathbb {N} }
is a set indicator function:
1
C
(
n
)
=
1
{\displaystyle 1_{C}(n)=1}
iff
n
∈
C
{\displaystyle n\in C}
, otherwise 0.
Id
{\displaystyle {\text{Id}}}
is the identity function with value n:
Id
(
n
)
=
n
{\displaystyle {\text{Id}}(n)=n}
.
Id
k
{\displaystyle {\text{Id}}_{k}}
is the kth power function:
Id
k
(
n
)
=
n
k
{\displaystyle {\text{Id}}_{k}(n)=n^{k}}
.
The following relations hold:
1
∗
μ
=
ε
{\displaystyle 1*\mu =\varepsilon }
, the Dirichlet inverse of the constant function
1
{\displaystyle 1}
is the Möbius function (see proof). Hence:
g
=
f
∗
1
{\displaystyle g=f*1}
if and only if
f
=
g
∗
μ
{\displaystyle f=g*\mu }
, the Möbius inversion formula
σ
k
=
Id
k
∗
1
{\displaystyle \sigma _{k}={\text{Id}}_{k}*1}
, the kth-power-of-divisors sum function σk
σ
=
Id
∗
1
{\displaystyle \sigma ={\text{Id}}*1}
, the sum-of-divisors function σ = σ1
τ
=
1
∗
1
{\displaystyle \tau =1*1}
, the number-of-divisors function τ(n) = σ0
Id
k
=
σ
k
∗
μ
{\displaystyle {\text{Id}}_{k}=\sigma _{k}*\mu }
, by Möbius inversion of the formulas for σk, σ, and τ
Id
=
σ
∗
μ
{\displaystyle {\text{Id}}=\sigma *\mu }
1
=
τ
∗
μ
{\displaystyle 1=\tau *\mu }
ϕ
∗
1
=
Id
{\displaystyle \phi *1={\text{Id}}}
, proved under Euler's totient function
ϕ
=
Id
∗
μ
{\displaystyle \phi ={\text{Id}}*\mu }
, by Möbius inversion
σ
=
ϕ
∗
τ
{\displaystyle \sigma =\phi *\tau }
, from convolving 1 on both sides of
ϕ
∗
1
=
Id
{\displaystyle \phi *1={\text{Id}}}
λ
∗
|
μ
|
=
ε
{\displaystyle \lambda *|\mu |=\varepsilon }
where λ is Liouville's function
λ
∗
1
=
1
Sq
{\displaystyle \lambda *1=1_{\text{Sq}}}
where Sq = {1, 4, 9, ...} is the set of squares
Id
k
∗
(
Id
k
μ
)
=
ε
{\displaystyle {\text{Id}}_{k}*({\text{Id}}_{k}\mu )=\varepsilon }
τ
3
∗
1
=
(
τ
∗
1
)
2
{\displaystyle \tau ^{3}*1=(\tau *1)^{2}}
J
k
∗
1
=
Id
k
{\displaystyle J_{k}*1={\text{Id}}_{k}}
, Jordan's totient function
(
Id
s
J
r
)
∗
J
s
=
J
s
+
r
{\displaystyle ({\text{Id}}_{s}J_{r})*J_{s}=J_{s+r}}
Λ
∗
1
=
log
{\displaystyle \Lambda *1=\log }
, where
Λ
{\displaystyle \Lambda }
is von Mangoldt's function
|
μ
|
∗
1
=
2
ω
,
{\displaystyle |\mu |\ast 1=2^{\omega },}
where
ω
(
n
)
{\displaystyle \omega (n)}
is the prime omega function counting distinct prime factors of n
Ω
∗
μ
=
1
P
{\displaystyle \Omega \ast \mu =1_{\mathcal {P}}}
, the characteristic function of the prime powers.
ω
∗
μ
=
1
P
{\displaystyle \omega \ast \mu =1_{\mathbb {P} }}
where
1
P
(
n
)
↦
{
0
,
1
}
{\displaystyle 1_{\mathbb {P} }(n)\mapsto \{0,1\}}
is the characteristic function of the primes.
This last identity shows that the prime-counting function is given by the summatory function
π
(
x
)
=
∑
n
≤
x
(
ω
∗
μ
)
(
n
)
=
∑
d
=
1
x
ω
(
d
)
M
(
⌊
x
d
⌋
)
{\displaystyle \pi (x)=\sum _{n\leq x}(\omega \ast \mu )(n)=\sum _{d=1}^{x}\omega (d)M\left(\left\lfloor {\frac {x}{d}}\right\rfloor \right)}
where
M
(
x
)
{\displaystyle M(x)}
is the Mertens function and
ω
{\displaystyle \omega }
is the distinct prime factor counting function from above. This expansion follows from the identity for the sums over Dirichlet convolutions given on the divisor sum identities page (a standard trick for these sums).
Dirichlet inverse
= Examples
=Given an arithmetic function
f
{\displaystyle f}
its Dirichlet inverse
g
=
f
−
1
{\displaystyle g=f^{-1}}
may be calculated recursively: the value of
g
(
n
)
{\displaystyle g(n)}
is in terms of
g
(
m
)
{\displaystyle g(m)}
for
m
<
n
{\displaystyle m
.
For
n
=
1
{\displaystyle n=1}
:
(
f
∗
g
)
(
1
)
=
f
(
1
)
g
(
1
)
=
ε
(
1
)
=
1
{\displaystyle (f*g)(1)=f(1)g(1)=\varepsilon (1)=1}
, so
g
(
1
)
=
1
/
f
(
1
)
{\displaystyle g(1)=1/f(1)}
. This implies that
f
{\displaystyle f}
does not have a Dirichlet inverse if
f
(
1
)
=
0
{\displaystyle f(1)=0}
.
For
n
=
2
{\displaystyle n=2}
:
(
f
∗
g
)
(
2
)
=
f
(
1
)
g
(
2
)
+
f
(
2
)
g
(
1
)
=
ε
(
2
)
=
0
{\displaystyle (f*g)(2)=f(1)g(2)+f(2)g(1)=\varepsilon (2)=0}
,
g
(
2
)
=
−
(
f
(
2
)
g
(
1
)
)
/
f
(
1
)
{\displaystyle g(2)=-(f(2)g(1))/f(1)}
,
For
n
=
3
{\displaystyle n=3}
:
(
f
∗
g
)
(
3
)
=
f
(
1
)
g
(
3
)
+
f
(
3
)
g
(
1
)
=
ε
(
3
)
=
0
{\displaystyle (f*g)(3)=f(1)g(3)+f(3)g(1)=\varepsilon (3)=0}
,
g
(
3
)
=
−
(
f
(
3
)
g
(
1
)
)
/
f
(
1
)
{\displaystyle g(3)=-(f(3)g(1))/f(1)}
,
For
n
=
4
{\displaystyle n=4}
:
(
f
∗
g
)
(
4
)
=
f
(
1
)
g
(
4
)
+
f
(
2
)
g
(
2
)
+
f
(
4
)
g
(
1
)
=
ε
(
4
)
=
0
{\displaystyle (f*g)(4)=f(1)g(4)+f(2)g(2)+f(4)g(1)=\varepsilon (4)=0}
,
g
(
4
)
=
−
(
f
(
4
)
g
(
1
)
+
f
(
2
)
g
(
2
)
)
/
f
(
1
)
{\displaystyle g(4)=-(f(4)g(1)+f(2)g(2))/f(1)}
,
and in general for
n
>
1
{\displaystyle n>1}
,
g
(
n
)
=
−
1
f
(
1
)
∑
d
∣
n
d
<
n
f
(
n
d
)
g
(
d
)
.
{\displaystyle g(n)\ =\ {\frac {-1}{f(1)}}\mathop {\sum _{d\,\mid \,n}} _{d
= Properties
=The following properties of the Dirichlet inverse hold:
The function f has a Dirichlet inverse if and only if f(1) ≠ 0.
The Dirichlet inverse of a multiplicative function is again multiplicative.
The Dirichlet inverse of a Dirichlet convolution is the convolution of the inverses of each function:
(
f
∗
g
)
−
1
=
f
−
1
∗
g
−
1
{\displaystyle (f\ast g)^{-1}=f^{-1}\ast g^{-1}}
.
A multiplicative function f is completely multiplicative if and only if
f
−
1
(
n
)
=
μ
(
n
)
f
(
n
)
{\displaystyle f^{-1}(n)=\mu (n)f(n)}
.
If f is completely multiplicative then
(
f
⋅
g
)
−
1
=
f
⋅
g
−
1
{\displaystyle (f\cdot g)^{-1}=f\cdot g^{-1}}
whenever
g
(
1
)
≠
0
{\displaystyle g(1)\neq 0}
and where
⋅
{\displaystyle \cdot }
denotes pointwise multiplication of functions.
= Other formulas
=An exact, non-recursive formula for the Dirichlet inverse of any arithmetic function f is given in Divisor sum identities. A more partition theoretic expression for the Dirichlet inverse of f is given by
f
−
1
(
n
)
=
∑
k
=
1
Ω
(
n
)
{
∑
λ
1
+
2
λ
2
+
⋯
+
k
λ
k
=
n
λ
1
,
λ
2
,
…
,
λ
k
|
n
(
λ
1
+
λ
2
+
⋯
+
λ
k
)
!
1
!
2
!
⋯
k
!
(
−
1
)
k
f
(
λ
1
)
f
(
λ
2
)
2
⋯
f
(
λ
k
)
k
}
.
{\displaystyle f^{-1}(n)=\sum _{k=1}^{\Omega (n)}\left\{\sum _{{\lambda _{1}+2\lambda _{2}+\cdots +k\lambda _{k}=n} \atop {\lambda _{1},\lambda _{2},\ldots ,\lambda _{k}|n}}{\frac {(\lambda _{1}+\lambda _{2}+\cdots +\lambda _{k})!}{1!2!\cdots k!}}(-1)^{k}f(\lambda _{1})f(\lambda _{2})^{2}\cdots f(\lambda _{k})^{k}\right\}.}
The following formula provides a compact way of expressing the Dirichlet inverse of an invertible arithmetic function f :
f
−
1
=
∑
k
=
0
+
∞
(
f
(
1
)
ε
−
f
)
∗
k
f
(
1
)
k
+
1
{\displaystyle f^{-1}=\sum _{k=0}^{+\infty }{\frac {(f(1)\varepsilon -f)^{*k}}{f(1)^{k+1}}}}
where the expression
(
f
(
1
)
ε
−
f
)
∗
k
{\displaystyle (f(1)\varepsilon -f)^{*k}}
stands for the arithmetic function
f
(
1
)
ε
−
f
{\displaystyle f(1)\varepsilon -f}
convoluted with itself k times. Notice that, for a fixed positive integer
n
{\displaystyle n}
, if
k
>
Ω
(
n
)
{\displaystyle k>\Omega (n)}
then
(
f
(
1
)
ε
−
f
)
∗
k
(
n
)
=
0
{\displaystyle (f(1)\varepsilon -f)^{*k}(n)=0}
, this is because
f
(
1
)
ε
(
1
)
−
f
(
1
)
=
0
{\displaystyle f(1)\varepsilon (1)-f(1)=0}
and every way of expressing n as a product of k positive integers must include a 1, so the series on the right hand side converges for every fixed positive integer n.
Dirichlet series
If f is an arithmetic function, the Dirichlet series generating function is defined by
D
G
(
f
;
s
)
=
∑
n
=
1
∞
f
(
n
)
n
s
{\displaystyle DG(f;s)=\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {f(n)}{n^{s}}}}
for those complex arguments s for which the series converges (if there are any). The multiplication of Dirichlet series is compatible with Dirichlet convolution in the following sense:
D
G
(
f
;
s
)
D
G
(
g
;
s
)
=
D
G
(
f
∗
g
;
s
)
{\displaystyle DG(f;s)DG(g;s)=DG(f*g;s)\,}
for all s for which both series of the left hand side converge, one of them at least converging
absolutely (note that simple convergence of both series of the left hand side does not imply convergence of the right hand side!). This is akin to the convolution theorem if one thinks of Dirichlet series as a Fourier transform.
Related concepts
The restriction of the divisors in the convolution to unitary, bi-unitary or infinitary divisors defines similar commutative operations which share many features with the Dirichlet convolution (existence of a Möbius inversion, persistence of multiplicativity, definitions of totients, Euler-type product formulas over associated primes, etc.).
Dirichlet convolution is a special case of the convolution multiplication for the incidence algebra of a poset, in this case the poset of positive integers ordered by divisibility.
The Dirichlet hyperbola method computes the summation of a convolution in terms of its functions and their summation functions.
See also
Arithmetic function
Divisor sum identities
Möbius inversion formula
References
Apostol, Tom M. (1976), Introduction to analytic number theory, Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics, New York-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-90163-3, MR 0434929, Zbl 0335.10001
Chan, Heng Huat (2009). Analytic Number Theory for Undergraduates. Monographs in Number Theory. World Scientific Publishing Company. ISBN 978-981-4271-36-3.
Hugh L. Montgomery; Robert C. Vaughan (2007). Multiplicative number theory I. Classical theory. Cambridge tracts in advanced mathematics. Vol. 97. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. p. 38. ISBN 978-0-521-84903-6.
Cohen, Eckford (1959). "A class of residue systems (mod r) and related arithmetical functions. I. A generalization of Möbius inversion". Pacific J. Math. Vol. 9, no. 1. pp. 13–23. MR 0109806.
Cohen, Eckford (1960). "Arithmetical functions associated with the unitary divisors of an integer". Mathematische Zeitschrift. 74: 66–80. doi:10.1007/BF01180473. MR 0112861.
Cohen, Eckford (1960). "The number of unitary divisors of an integer". American Mathematical Monthly. Vol. 67, no. 9. pp. 879–880. MR 0122790.
Cohen, Graeme L. (1990). "On an integers' infinitary divisors". Math. Comp. 54 (189): 395–411. doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-1990-0993927-5. MR 0993927.
Cohen, Graeme L. (1993). "Arithmetic functions associated with infinitary divisors of an integer". Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 16 (2): 373–383. doi:10.1155/S0161171293000456.
Haukkanen, Pentti (2000). "Expressions for the Dirichlet inverse of arithmetical functions". Notes on Number Theory and Discrete Mathematics. 6 (4): 118–124.
Sandor, Jozsef; Berge, Antal (2003). "The Möbius function: generalizations and extensions". Adv. Stud. Contemp. Math. (Kyungshang). 6 (2): 77–128. MR 1962765.
Finch, Steven (2004). "Unitarism and Infinitarism" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-02-22.
External links
"Dirichlet convolution", Encyclopedia of Mathematics, EMS Press, 2001 [1994]
Kata Kunci Pencarian:
- Terence Tao
- Dirichlet convolution
- Convolution (disambiguation)
- Dirichlet series
- Multiplicative function
- Convolution
- Completely multiplicative function
- Arithmetic function
- Möbius function
- List of things named after Peter Gustav Lejeune Dirichlet
- Dirichlet kernel
