• Source: Effective number of parties

In political science, the effective number of parties is a diversity index introduced by Laakso and Rein Taagepera (1979), which provides for an adjusted number of political parties in a country's party system, weighted by their relative size. The measure is especially useful when comparing party systems across countries.
The size of a party can be measured by either:

The effective number of electoral parties (ENEP) weights parties by their share of the vote.
The effective number of parliamentary parties (ENPP) weights parties by their share of seats in the legislature.
The number of parties equals the effective number of parties only when all parties have equal strength. In any other case, the effective number of parties is lower than the actual number of parties. The effective number of parties is a frequent operationalization for political fragmentation. Political concentration can seen as the share of power of large political parties.

There are several common alternatives for how to define the effective number of parties. John K. Wildgen's index of "hyperfractionalization" accords special weight to small parties. Juan Molinar's index gives special weight to the largest party. Dunleavy and Boucek provide a useful critique of the Molinar index.




Measures






= Quadratic

=
Laakso and Taagepera (1979) were the first to define the effective number of parties using the following formula:




N
=


1


∑

i
=
1


n



p

i


2







{\displaystyle N={\frac {1}{\sum _{i=1}^{n}p_{i}^{2}}}}


where n is the number of parties with at least one vote/seat and




p

i


2




{\displaystyle p_{i}^{2}}

the square of each party's proportion of all votes or seats. This is also the formula for the inverse Simpson index, or the true diversity of order 2. This definition is still the most commonly-used in political science.
This measure is equivalent to the Herfindahl–Hirschman index, used in economics; the Simpson diversity index in ecology; the inverse participation ratio (IPR) in physics; and the Rényi entropy of order



α
=
2


{\displaystyle \alpha =2}

in information theory.




= Alternatives

=
An alternative formula was proposed by Grigorii Golosov in 2010.




N
=

∑

i
=
1


n





p

i




p

i


+

p

1


2


−

p

i


2







{\displaystyle N=\sum _{i=1}^{n}{\frac {p_{i}}{p_{i}+p_{1}^{2}-p_{i}^{2}}}}


which is equivalent – if we only consider parties with at least one vote/seat – to




N
=

∑

i
=
1


n




1

1
+
(

p

1


2



/


p

i


)
−

p

i







{\displaystyle N=\sum _{i=1}^{n}{\frac {1}{1+(p_{1}^{2}/p_{i})-p_{i}}}}


Here, n is the number of parties,




p

i


2




{\displaystyle p_{i}^{2}}

the square of each party's proportion of all votes or seats, and




p

1


2




{\displaystyle p_{1}^{2}}

is the square of the largest party's proportion of all votes or seats.




Values


The following table illustrates the difference between the values produced by the two formulas for eight hypothetical vote or seat constellations:




Seat product model


The effective number of parties can be predicted with the seat product model as



N
=
(
M
S

)

1

/

6




{\displaystyle N=(MS)^{1/6}}

, where M is the district magnitude and S is the assembly size.




Effective number of parties by country



For individual countries the values of effective number of number of parliamentary parties (ENPP) for the last available election is shown. Some of the highest effective number of parties are in Brazil, Belgium, and Bosnia and Herzegovina. European Parliament has an even higher effective number of parties if national parties are considered, yet a much lower effective number of parties if political groups of the European Parliament are considered.




See also


Duverger's law – Winner-takes-all voting systems tend to result in only two viable parties
First-past-the-post voting – Plurality voting system
Majoritarian representation – System favoring larger parties over smaller onesPages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
Multi-party system – Political system in which three or more parties can run for, and win in, national elections
One-party state – State in which only one party has the right to form the government
Proportional representation – Voting system that makes outcomes proportional to vote totals
Two-party system – Government system dominated by only two major political parties
Vote splitting – Losing candidate affecting election resultPages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
Electoral competition – Competition between political parties or candidates
Micromega rule – Preferences of political parties for electoral systems




References






External links


Michael Gallagher providing data on the Laakso-Taagepera effective number of parties for over 900 elections in over 100 countries
Average effective number of parties (Golosov) for 183 democratic party systems and non-systems, 1792–2009, reported in Golosov, Grigorii V., "Towards a Classification of the World's Democratic Party Systems, Step 1: Identifying the Units", Party Politics, Vol. 19, No. 1, January 2013, pp. 134–138.
How to compute Golosov’s effective number of parties in Excel

Kata Kunci Pencarian:

• Jumlah partai efektif
• Sarawak
• BTR-60
• Daftar episode Alvin and the Chipmunks
• Effective number of parties
• Political party
• Two-party system
• Party system
• Political fragmentation
• Herfindahl–Hirschman index
• Diversity index
• Democracy indices
• Duverger's law
• Government