- Source: Parker v. Brown
- Terik batu
- Spanyol Habsburg
- Imperium Spanyol
- Film porno
- Hukum Jim Crow
- The People v. O. J. Simpson: American Crime Story
- Gerakan Hak-Hak Sipil Afrika-Amerika (1896–1954)
- Edward VIII dari Britania Raya
- Charles III dari Britania Raya
- Daftar antariksawan
- Parker v. Brown
- Parker
- Parker immunity doctrine
- North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Ass'n v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.
- Marsh owl
- Robert B. Parker
- United States antitrust law
- Eurasian bittern
- House sparrow
Back to the Future (1985)
Snoopy Presents: Welcome Home, Franklin (2024)
Spider-Man: Homecoming (2017)
The Amazing Spider-Man (2012)
Spider-Man (2002)
Elvis (2022)
Spider-Man: Far From Home (2019)
No More Posts Available.
No more pages to load.
Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 (1943), was a United States Supreme Court case on the scope of United States antitrust law. It held that actions taken by state governments were exempt from the scope of the Sherman Act.
The case was an appeal from a decree of a district court of three judges enjoining the enforcement, against the appellee, of a marketing program adopted pursuant to the California Agricultural Prorate Act.
The case led to the Parker immunity doctrine. The Supreme Court clarified its position in later judgments.
External links
Works related to Parker v. Brown at Wikisource
Text of Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 (1943) is available from: Findlaw Justia