• Source: Projective bundle
  • In mathematics, a projective bundle is a fiber bundle whose fibers are projective spaces.
    By definition, a scheme X over a Noetherian scheme S is a Pn-bundle if it is locally a projective n-space; i.e.,



    X

    ×

    S


    U



    P


    U


    n




    {\displaystyle X\times _{S}U\simeq \mathbb {P} _{U}^{n}}

    and transition automorphisms are linear. Over a regular scheme S such as a smooth variety, every projective bundle is of the form




    P

    (
    E
    )


    {\displaystyle \mathbb {P} (E)}

    for some vector bundle (locally free sheaf) E.


    The projective bundle of a vector bundle


    Every vector bundle over a variety X gives a projective bundle by taking the projective spaces of the fibers, but not all projective bundles arise in this way: there is an obstruction in the cohomology group H2(X,O*). To see why, recall that a projective bundle comes equipped with transition functions on double intersections of a suitable open cover. On triple overlaps, any lift of these transition functions satisfies the cocycle condition up to an invertible function. The collection of these functions forms a 2-cocycle which vanishes in H2(X,O*) only if the projective bundle is the projectivization of a vector bundle. In particular, if X is a compact Riemann surface then H2(X,O*)=0, and so this obstruction vanishes.
    The projective bundle of a vector bundle E is the same thing as the Grassmann bundle




    G

    1


    (
    E
    )


    {\displaystyle G_{1}(E)}

    of 1-planes in E.
    The projective bundle P(E) of a vector bundle E is characterized by the universal property that says:

    Given a morphism f: T → X, to factorize f through the projection map p: P(E) → X is to specify a line subbundle of f*E.
    For example, taking f to be p, one gets the line subbundle O(-1) of p*E, called the tautological line bundle on P(E). Moreover, this O(-1) is a universal bundle in the sense that when a line bundle L gives a factorization f = p ∘ g, L is the pullback of O(-1) along g. See also Cone#O(1) for a more explicit construction of O(-1).
    On P(E), there is a natural exact sequence (called the tautological exact sequence):




    0




    O




    P

    (
    E
    )


    (

    1
    )


    p




    E

    Q

    0


    {\displaystyle 0\to {\mathcal {O}}_{\mathbf {P} (E)}(-1)\to p^{*}E\to Q\to 0}


    where Q is called the tautological quotient-bundle.
    Let E ⊂ F be vector bundles (locally free sheaves of finite rank) on X and G = F/E. Let q: P(F) → X be the projection. Then the natural map O(-1) → q*F → q*G is a global section of the sheaf hom Hom(O(-1), q*G) = q* G ⊗ O(1). Moreover, this natural map vanishes at a point exactly when the point is a line in E; in other words, the zero-locus of this section is P(E).
    A particularly useful instance of this construction is when F is the direct sum E ⊕ 1 of E and the trivial line bundle (i.e., the structure sheaf). Then P(E) is a hyperplane in P(E ⊕ 1), called the hyperplane at infinity, and the complement of P(E) can be identified with E. In this way, P(E ⊕ 1) is referred to as the projective completion (or "compactification") of E.
    The projective bundle P(E) is stable under twisting E by a line bundle; precisely, given a line bundle L, there is the natural isomorphism:




    g
    :

    P

    (
    E
    )







    P

    (
    E

    L
    )


    {\displaystyle g:\mathbf {P} (E){\overset {\sim }{\to }}\mathbf {P} (E\otimes L)}


    such that




    g




    (


    O


    (

    1
    )
    )



    O


    (

    1
    )


    p




    L
    .


    {\displaystyle g^{*}({\mathcal {O}}(-1))\simeq {\mathcal {O}}(-1)\otimes p^{*}L.}

    (In fact, one gets g by the universal property applied to the line bundle on the right.)


    Examples


    Many non-trivial examples of projective bundles can be found using fibrations over





    P


    1




    {\displaystyle \mathbb {P} ^{1}}

    such as Lefschetz fibrations. For example, an elliptic K3 surface



    X


    {\displaystyle X}

    is a K3 surface with a fibration



    π
    :
    X



    P


    1




    {\displaystyle \pi :X\to \mathbb {P} ^{1}}

    such that the fibers




    E

    p




    {\displaystyle E_{p}}

    for



    p



    P


    1




    {\displaystyle p\in \mathbb {P} ^{1}}

    are generically elliptic curves. Because every elliptic curve is a genus 1 curve with a distinguished point, there exists a global section of the fibration. Because of this global section, there exists a model of



    X


    {\displaystyle X}

    giving a morphism to the projective bundle



    X


    P

    (



    O





    P


    1




    (
    4
    )




    O





    P


    1




    (
    6
    )




    O





    P


    1




    )


    {\displaystyle X\to \mathbb {P} ({\mathcal {O}}_{\mathbb {P} ^{1}}(4)\oplus {\mathcal {O}}_{\mathbb {P} ^{1}}(6)\oplus {\mathcal {O}}_{\mathbb {P} ^{1}})}

    defined by the Weierstrass equation




    y

    2


    z
    +

    a

    1


    x
    y
    z
    +

    a

    3


    y

    z

    2


    =

    x

    3


    +

    a

    2



    x

    2


    z
    +

    a

    4


    x

    z

    2


    +

    a

    6



    z

    3




    {\displaystyle y^{2}z+a_{1}xyz+a_{3}yz^{2}=x^{3}+a_{2}x^{2}z+a_{4}xz^{2}+a_{6}z^{3}}

    where



    x
    ,
    y
    ,
    z


    {\displaystyle x,y,z}

    represent the local coordinates of






    O





    P


    1




    (
    4
    )
    ,



    O





    P


    1




    (
    6
    )
    ,



    O





    P


    1






    {\displaystyle {\mathcal {O}}_{\mathbb {P} ^{1}}(4),{\mathcal {O}}_{\mathbb {P} ^{1}}(6),{\mathcal {O}}_{\mathbb {P} ^{1}}}

    , respectively, and the coefficients




    a

    i




    H

    0


    (


    P


    1


    ,



    O





    P


    1




    (
    2
    i
    )
    )


    {\displaystyle a_{i}\in H^{0}(\mathbb {P} ^{1},{\mathcal {O}}_{\mathbb {P} ^{1}}(2i))}

    are sections of sheaves on





    P


    1




    {\displaystyle \mathbb {P} ^{1}}

    . Note this equation is well-defined because each term in the Weierstrass equation has total degree



    12


    {\displaystyle 12}

    (meaning the degree of the coefficient plus the degree of the monomial. For example,




    deg

    (

    a

    1


    x
    y
    z
    )
    =
    2
    +
    (
    4
    +
    6
    +
    0
    )
    =
    12


    {\displaystyle {\text{deg}}(a_{1}xyz)=2+(4+6+0)=12}

    ).


    Cohomology ring and Chow group


    Let X be a complex smooth projective variety and E a complex vector bundle of rank r on it. Let p: P(E) → X be the projective bundle of E. Then the cohomology ring H*(P(E)) is an algebra over H*(X) through the pullback p*. Then the first Chern class ζ = c1(O(1)) generates H*(P(E)) with the relation





    ζ

    r


    +

    c

    1


    (
    E
    )

    ζ

    r

    1


    +

    +

    c

    r


    (
    E
    )
    =
    0


    {\displaystyle \zeta ^{r}+c_{1}(E)\zeta ^{r-1}+\cdots +c_{r}(E)=0}


    where ci(E) is the i-th Chern class of E. One interesting feature of this description is that one can define Chern classes as the coefficients in the relation; this is the approach taken by Grothendieck.
    Over fields other than the complex field, the same description remains true with Chow ring in place of cohomology ring (still assuming X is smooth). In particular, for Chow groups, there is the direct sum decomposition





    A

    k


    (

    P

    (
    E
    )
    )
    =



    i
    =
    0


    r

    1



    ζ

    i



    A

    k

    r
    +
    1
    +
    i


    (
    X
    )
    .


    {\displaystyle A_{k}(\mathbf {P} (E))=\bigoplus _{i=0}^{r-1}\zeta ^{i}A_{k-r+1+i}(X).}


    As it turned out, this decomposition remains valid even if X is not smooth nor projective. In contrast, Ak(E) = Ak-r(X), via the Gysin homomorphism, morally because that the fibers of E, the vector spaces, are contractible.


    See also


    Proj construction
    cone (algebraic geometry)
    ruled surface (an example of a projective bundle)
    Severi–Brauer variety
    Hirzebruch surface


    References



    Elencwajg, G.; Narasimhan, M. S. (1983), "Projective bundles on a complex torus", Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, 1983 (340): 1–5, doi:10.1515/crll.1983.340.1, ISSN 0075-4102, MR 0691957, S2CID 122557310
    Fulton, William (1998), Intersection theory, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge., vol. 2 (2nd ed.), Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-3-540-62046-4, MR 1644323
    Hartshorne, Robin (1977), Algebraic Geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 52, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-90244-9, MR 0463157

Kata Kunci Pencarian: