• Source: Silkin v Beaverbrook Newspapers Ltd

In Silkin v. Beaverbrook Newspapers Ltd., [1958] 1 W.L.R. 743, a House of Lords case, the famous speech of Lord Diplock states succinctly the principle that freedom of speech is subject to the law and like any other freedom there is a balancing. In freedom of speech this right must be balanced against the essential need of the individuals to protect their reputation.
Lord Diplock stated (at pp. 745–46):

Freedom of speech, like the other fundamental freedoms, is freedom under the law, and over the years the law has maintained a balance between, on the one hand, the right of the individual . . . whether he is in public life or not, to his unsullied reputation if he deserves it, and on the other hand . . . the right of the public . . . to express their views honestly and fearlessly on matters of public interest, even though that involves strong criticism of the conduct of public people.

Kata Kunci Pencarian:

• Silkin v Beaverbrook Newspapers Ltd
• Hill v Church of Scientology of Toronto
• Fair comment
• List of landmark judgements of the House of Lords
• Kenneth Diplock, Baron Diplock
• Jonathan Guinness, 3rd Baron Moyne
• Colin Moynihan, 4th Baron Moynihan
• Nathaniel Rothschild, 5th Baron Rothschild
• Francis Newall, 2nd Baron Newall
• Alexander Fermor-Hesketh, 3rd Baron Hesketh