- Source: Wood v. Allen
- Harimau
- Amerika Serikat
- Perang Dunia I
- Perang Dunia II
- Daftar ahli geografi
- The Rolling Stones
- Teori alienasi Marx
- Junkers Ju 87
- Perjanjian Nanking
- Kualifikasi Piala Dunia FIFA 2026 – Babak Kedua CONCACAF
- Wood v. Allen
- Allen v. Farrow
- Jenny Wood-Allen
- Woody Allen
- Allen Wood (footballer)
- List of United States Supreme Court opinions involving capital punishment
- Woody Allen sexual abuse allegation
- People v. Turner
- Allen K. Wood
- Joan Allen
Wood v. Allen, 558 U.S. 290 (2010), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the state court's conclusion that the petitioner's counsel made a strategic decision not to pursue or present evidence of his mental deficiencies was not an unreasonable determination of the facts. The Court therefore denied the habeas corpus petition. Having thus disposed of the claim, the Court declined to decide the issues the petition raised about interpreting the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act.
References
External links
Text of Wood v. Allen, 558 U.S. 290 (2010) is available from: Cornell Findlaw Justia
This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain. "[T]he Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court." Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591, 668 (1834)