- Gerakan Hak-Hak Sipil Afrika-Amerika (1955-1968)
- Pemboikotan bus Montgomery
- Bernie Sanders
- Vivian Malone Jones
- Freedom Summer
- Nonkekerasan
- Emmett Till
- W.E.B. Du Bois
- Abraham Lincoln Davis
- Martha Nussbaum
- Boynton v. Virginia
- Bruce Boynton
- Amelia Boynton Robinson
- Loving v. Virginia
- Freedom Riders
- Anniston and Birmingham bus attacks
- Ruby Bridges
- Brown v. Board of Education
- Plessy v. Ferguson
- Morgan v. Virginia
- Boynton v. Virginia - Wikipedia
- Boynton v. Virginia, 364 U.S. 454 (1960) - Justia US Supreme …
- Boynton v. Virginia | Oyez
- Boynton v. Virginia | law case | Britannica
- Boynton v. Virginia: 1960 - Encyclopedia.com
- U.S. Reports: Boynton v. Virginia, 364 U.S. 454 (1960).
- Boynton v. Virginia - Simple English Wikipedia, the free …
- Boynton v. Virginia 1960 - Encyclopedia.com
- Boynton v. Virginia - Wikisource, the free online library
- Boynton v. Virginia - Significance, Court Splits, But For Boynton
The Bourne Identity (2002)
The Incredible Hulk (2008)
Boynton v. Virginia GudangMovies21 Rebahinxxi LK21
Boynton v. Virginia, 364 U.S. 454 (1960), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court. The case overturned a judgment convicting an African American law student for trespassing by being in a restaurant in a bus terminal which was "whites only". It held that racial segregation in public transportation was illegal because such segregation violated the Interstate Commerce Act, which broadly forbade discrimination in interstate passenger transportation. It moreover held that bus transportation was sufficiently related to interstate commerce to allow the United States federal government to regulate it to forbid racial discrimination in the industry.
Thurgood Marshall argued the case for Boynton. The majority opinion was written by Justice Hugo Black.
The significance of Boynton was not located in its holding since it managed to avoid deciding any Constitutional questions in its decision, and its expansive reading of Federal powers regarding interstate commerce was also well established by the time of the decision. Its significance is that its outlawing of racial segregation in public transportation led directly to a movement called the Freedom Rides, in which African Americans and whites together rode various forms of public transportation in the South to challenge local laws or customs that enforced segregation. The Freedom Rides, and the violent reactions they provoked, prompted Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy to confront the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) with its failure to enforce a bus desegregation ruling it had handed down in 1955, Sarah Keys v. Carolina Coach Company, 64 MCC 769 (1955) as well as the companion train desegregation case, NAACP v. St. Louis-Santa Fe Railway Company, 297 ICC 335 (1955). By presenting the commission with its own rulings in a May 29, 1961, petition, Kennedy was able to prompt it to do what it had promised in 1955, five years before the Boynton ruling was handed down, and six years before the Freedom Riders set out to test Boynton across the Deep South. On September 22, 1961, the ICC issued regulations which implemented its 1955 Keys and NAACP rulings, as well as the Supreme Court's ruling in Boynton, and on November 1 those regulations went into effect, effectively ending Jim Crow in public transportation.
Boynton's trip and arrest
In the winter of 1958, Bruce Boynton was a student at Howard University School of Law in Washington, D.C. While travelling on a Trailways bus for a holiday trip to his home in Selma, Alabama, his bus arrived at the Trailways station on East Broad Street in Richmond, Virginia. Passengers disembarked for a 40-minute layover. Unlike other black passengers, Boynton went into a "whites only" restaurant, where he ordered a cheeseburger and a cup of hot tea. He never had problems in Northern states, but he grew up in Selma and was familiar with segregation of restaurants and movie theaters. It was not his intent to test any laws in the South that night.
Ordered to move to the "black" section and knowing that his arrest was likely, Boynton pointed out to authorities that he was an American citizen with federal rights and, thus, was entitled to his burger and tea. Handcuffed and arrested on a misdemeanor trespass charge, he spent the night in jail and was fined $10 in a Richmond municipal court.
Boynton in the Virginia courts
In the Richmond Police Court, Boynton was convicted of violating a state statute making it a misdemeanor for any person "without authority of law" to remain upon the premises of another after having been forbidden to do so. His conviction was sustained in Richmond's Hustings Court.
On appeal, he contended that his conviction violated the Interstate Commerce Act and the Equal Protection, Due Process and Commerce Clauses of the Federal Constitution; but his conviction was sustained by the Supreme Court of Virginia.
Boynton's Federal appeal
Future U.S. Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall argued Boynton's case on appeal in the Federal Courts. On petition for certiorari to the Supreme Court, he raised only the constitutional questions.
Supreme Court Ruling
See also
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 364
References
Further reading
Barnes, Catherine A. Journey from Jim Crow: The Desegregation of Southern Transit, Columbia University Press, 1983.
Arsenault, Raymond. Freedom Riders: 1961 and the Struggle for Racial Justice, Oxford University Press, 2006.
External links
Works related to Boynton v. Virginia at Wikisource
Text of Boynton v. Virginia, 364 U.S. 454 (1960) is available from: CourtListener Findlaw Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)
Kata Kunci Pencarian:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6bde/a6bde06455631269a973801e819459f533343131" alt="Boynton v. Virginia | law case | Britannica"
Boynton v. Virginia | law case | Britannica
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1db28/1db28078e1e2baae6359451a49b695615ce281c0" alt="Boynton v. Virginia - Civil Rights Movement"
Boynton v. Virginia - Civil Rights Movement
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/691ef/691efd0d1955d4c1c758335f3b8a6f58aaf23e6d" alt="Boynton v. Virginia / SamePassage"
Boynton v. Virginia / SamePassage
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/83ac1/83ac1c1875b820704cb6c30d1e12d47db11cdcf2" alt="Boynton v. Virginia - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia"
Boynton v. Virginia - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6119a/6119a909080073298f987dc93ebab6b87e0ab9eb" alt="Boynton v. Virginia is Ruled - African American Registry"
Boynton v. Virginia is Ruled - African American Registry
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61de5/61de5fd9f629fd87bfd7e6b3f1508b4b0159762f" alt="Boynton v. Virginia: 1960 - Court Splits, But For Boynton - Restaurant ..."
Boynton v. Virginia: 1960 - Court Splits, But For Boynton - Restaurant ...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6ab1/f6ab1173a4b0a4452ee5813483a1effa6045a4ac" alt="Boynton v. Virginia | NewseumED"
Boynton v. Virginia | NewseumED
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/013f1/013f1d9a2feaf37c135c3e38792c5db43c171644" alt="(DOWNLOAD) "Boynton v. Virginia" by Supreme Court of the United States ..."
(DOWNLOAD) "Boynton v. Virginia" by Supreme Court of the United States ...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f82f8/f82f8d4767ba6a31ae7cd790594548072d00a07e" alt="Boynton v. Virginia | Overview, Summary & Ruling | Study.com"
Boynton v. Virginia | Overview, Summary & Ruling | Study.com
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a1ed/8a1ed70c0d16a427b697002070977a4f3f24ca48" alt="Boynton v. Virginia Outlaws Segregation of Interstate Travel, 1960 ..."
Boynton v. Virginia Outlaws Segregation of Interstate Travel, 1960 ...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bcfdc/bcfdcbb1740f63417b1f0539c121dbaf792e026d" alt="Comités de Defensa del Barrio: Freedom Riders: Boynton v. Virginia, 1960"
Comités de Defensa del Barrio: Freedom Riders: Boynton v. Virginia, 1960
THE BLACK SOCIAL HISTORY:: BLACK SOCIAL HISTORY : BOYNTON v VIRGINIA ...
boynton v virginia
Daftar Isi
Boynton v. Virginia - Wikipedia
Boynton v. Virginia, 364 U.S. 454 (1960), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court. [1] The case overturned a judgment convicting an African American law student for trespassing by being in a restaurant in a bus terminal which was "whites only".
Boynton v. Virginia, 364 U.S. 454 (1960) - Justia US Supreme …
Boynton v. Virginia: The culmination of a long line of cases, this decision held that the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887 should be interpreted to ban all forms of segregation by race in any type of public transportation.
Boynton v. Virginia | Oyez
Bruce Boynton, an African American law student, bought a Trailways bus ticket from Washington, D.C. to Montgomery, Alabama. The bus route went through Richmond, Virginia, where there was a 40-minute stop scheduled.
Boynton v. Virginia | law case | Britannica
Virginia decision of 1960, which extended the earlier ruling to include bus terminals, restrooms, and other facilities associated with interstate travel, a group of seven African Americans and six whites left Washington, D.C., on May 4, 1961, on a Freedom Ride in two…
Boynton v. Virginia: 1960 - Encyclopedia.com
On December 5, 1960, the Supreme Court decided 7-2 in favor of Boynton, the first time since 1946 it had divided on a matter of racial segregation.
U.S. Reports: Boynton v. Virginia, 364 U.S. 454 (1960).
Black, H. L. & Supreme Court Of The United States. (1960) U.S. Reports: Boynton v. Virginia, 364 U.S. 454. [Periodical] Retrieved from the Library of Congress, …
Boynton v. Virginia - Simple English Wikipedia, the free …
Boynton v. Virginia, 364 U.S. 454 (1960), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. On December 20, 1958, Bruce Boynton, a senior at Howard Law School, left Washington, D.C. on a bus to go home for Christmas to Montgomery, Alabama. [1] At the bus terminal in Richmond, Virginia he entered the restaurant and sat in the "white only ...
Boynton v. Virginia 1960 - Encyclopedia.com
Boynton v. Virginia 1960. Petitioner: Bruce Boynton. Respondent: Commonwealth of Virginia. Petitioner's Claim: That arresting a black interstate bus passenger for refusing to leave a whites-only section of a bus station restaurant violated the Interstate Commerce Act and the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
Boynton v. Virginia - Wikisource, the free online library
Feb 6, 2024 · Boynton v. Virginia, 364 U.S. 454 (1960) was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. The case overturned a judgment convicting an African American law student for trespassing by being in a restaurant in a bus terminal which was "whites only."
Boynton v. Virginia - Significance, Court Splits, But For Boynton
Bruce Boynton. Respondent. Commonwealth of Virginia. Petitioner's Claim. That his arrest for refusing to leave a whites only section in a bus station restaurant violated the Interstate Commerce Act, and the Equal Protection, Due Process, and Commerce Clauses of the U.S. Constitution. Chief Lawyer for Petitioner. Thurgood Marshall. Chief Lawyer ...