Kata Kunci Pencarian:

    Search Results

    Artikel Terkait "three peer review myths debunked by the"

    Three myths about scientific peer review – Michael Nielsen

    08 Jan 2009 · To sum up: there is very little reliable evidence about the effect of peer review available from systematic studies; peer review is at best an imperfect filter for validity and …

    Three myths about peer review - P2P Foundation

    08 Mar 2009 · The myth that scientists adopted peer review broadly and early in the history of science is surprisingly widely believed, despite being false. It’s true that peer review has been …

    Open Research Myths | Facts vs Fiction | Gates Open …

    31 Mei 2022 · Transparency in the peer review process is a hallmark for quality and accountability, making it easier to know if research can be trusted, whilst also enabling conversation within the research community and reducing the …

    Myths and Misconceptions about Academic Peer Review

    10 Apr 2018 · Here we debunk several of the stubborn myths out there about the academic peer review process and clarify the role of peer review in the publishing process.

    Debunking three open peer review myths - HRB Open Research …

    11 Mei 2022 · The first myth to be debunked is that open peer review isn’t as rigorous as closed peer review, resulting in lesser quality research. This stems from the idea that open peer …

    Affirmative citation bias in scientific myth debunking: A three

    09 Sep 2019 · Examining 613 articles we demonstrate that the reception of three myth-exposing publications is skewed by an ‘affirmative citation bias’: The vast majority of articles citing the …

    Fact and fiction in peer review | Nature Human Behaviour

    24 Mar 2022 · There are a lot of myths surrounding the peer review process. Here, we separate misconceptions from reality in the peer review process at Nature Human Behaviour.

    Review Everything You Need to Know About Peer Review — The Good…

    01 Agu 2019 · This article offers succinct guidance about peer review: not only “what to do” (the Good) but also “what not to do” (the Bad) and “what to never do” (the Ugly). It outlines models of peer review and provides an overview of types of reviewer bias, including conflict of interest.