Yates v. United States (2015) GudangMovies21 Rebahinxxi LK21

      Yates v. United States, 574 U.S. 528 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court construed 18 U.S.C. § 1519, a provision added to the federal criminal code by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, to criminalize the destruction or concealment of "any record, document, or tangible object" to obstruct a federal investigation. By a 5-to-4 vote, the Court stated that the term "tangible object" as used in this section means an object used to record or preserve information, and that this did not include fish.


      Background


      Petitioner John L. Yates, a commercial fisherman, was operating in the Gulf of Mexico when a federal agent conducted an offshore inspection and found that the ship's catch had 72 undersized red grouper, in violation of United States federal conservation regulations. The federal agent instructed Captain Yates to keep the undersized fish segregated. The agent measured the fish again at port the next day, and found that 69 red grouper were undersized instead of 72. A crew member said that Yates instructed his crew to throw the undersized fish overboard, resulting in Yates being charged under 18 United States Code §1519.
      This provision, originating from the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, states that a person may be fined or imprisoned for up to 20 years if the person "knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence" a federal investigation.
      At trial, Yates sought an acquittal for the §1519 charge arguing that fish were not tangible objects related to record-keeping. The District Court denied the acquittal motion. Yates was found guilty by a jury of violating §1519 and sentenced to 30 days' imprisonment. The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the conviction, holding that fish have a physical form and are therefore a tangible object under a dictionary definition.
      Yates' attorney, now-federal judge John Badalamenti, petitioned for a writ of certiorari, which the Supreme Court granted.


      Opinion of the Court


      Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg authored the plurality opinion, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor, holding that "within §1519's compass," a tangible object is "one used to record or preserve information."
      Among other things, the plurality relied upon traditional canons of statutory construction including the canons noscitur a sociis ("a word is known by the company it keeps") and ejusdem generis ("general words following a list of specific words should usually be read in light of those specific words"), as well as the section's enactment as part of a statute dealing with financial fraud and its location within title 18.
      Associate Justice Samuel Alito filed a separate opinion concurring in the judgment.


      = Dissent

      =
      Associate Justice Elena Kagan, joined by Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, and Clarence Thomas, dissented. Justice Kagan concluded that a tangible object is "any object capable of being touched.": 28  Citing the United States Code and other U.S. laws, Kagan argued that tangible object "invariably covers physical objects of all
      kinds" and that the surrounding language of §1519 makes it clear that Congress "meant the term to have a wide range.": 28 
      The dissenting opinion suggests that the plurality opinion acknowledges that a tangible object is "a discrete thing that possesses physical form.": 29  Kagan continues this line of argument by holding that a fish "is, of course, a discrete thing that possesses physical form," citing Dr. Seuss's book One Fish Two Fish Red Fish Blue Fish (1960) as general evidence. Kagan's view is that under the "ordinary meaning of the term," a tangible object in §1519 covers fish (including undersized red grouper).: 29 


      See also



      List of United States Supreme Court cases
      List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 574


      References




      Further reading


      DeFrancesco, Lindsay (2016). "Yates v. United States: Floundering About in the Choppy Waters of Statutory Interpretation". Maryland Law Review. 75 (1): 635–671.


      External links


      Text of Yates v. United States, 574 U.S. 528 (2015) is available from: Justia Oyez (oral argument audio) Supreme Court (slip opinion) (archived)

    Kata Kunci Pencarian:


    Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /www/wwwroot/5.180.24.3/wp-content/themes/muvipro/search.php on line 388
    Yates v. United States, 354 U.S. 298 (1957) | PDF | Supreme Court Of ...

    Yates v. United States, 354 U.S. 298 (1957) | PDF | Supreme Court Of ...

    Yates Testifies She Warned White House about Gen. Flynn | PBS NewsHour ...

    Yates Testifies She Warned White House about Gen. Flynn | PBS NewsHour ...

    Yates v. United States - Alchetron, The Free Social Encyclopedia

    Yates v. United States - Alchetron, The Free Social Encyclopedia

    Yates v. United States by Chris Arthur on Prezi

    Yates v. United States by Chris Arthur on Prezi

    Meet John Yates of Yates v. United States - Cause of Action Institute

    Meet John Yates of Yates v. United States - Cause of Action Institute

    Yates v. United States (1957) | The First Amendment Encyclopedia

    Yates v. United States (1957) | The First Amendment Encyclopedia

    Yates v. United States (1957) | The First Amendment Encyclopedia

    Yates v. United States (1957) | The First Amendment Encyclopedia

    Yates v. United States | Cato Institute

    Yates v. United States | Cato Institute

    ‎Yates v. United States on Apple Books

    ‎Yates v. United States on Apple Books

    Yates v. United States, 354 U.S. 298, 77 S.Ct. 1064, 1 L.Ed.2d 1356 ...

    Yates v. United States, 354 U.S. 298, 77 S.Ct. 1064, 1 L.Ed.2d 1356 ...

    United States v. Yates, 553 F.2d 518 (1977): Case Brief Summary | Quimbee

    United States v. Yates, 553 F.2d 518 (1977): Case Brief Summary | Quimbee

    Yates v. United States - TOPIC: Statutory Interpretation CAPTION: Yates ...

    Yates v. United States - TOPIC: Statutory Interpretation CAPTION: Yates ...

    Search Results

    yates v united states 2015

    Daftar Isi

    Yates v. United States, 574 U.S. 528 (2015) - Justia US Supreme …

    Apr 28, 2014 · JOHN L. YATES, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES. on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the eleventh circuit [February 25, 2015] Justice Kagan, with …

    Yates v. United States | Oyez

    Nov 5, 2014 · The district court found Yates guilty of disposing of undersized fish and therefore in violation of a statute that makes it a crime to destroy or conceal "a tangible object with the …

    Yates v. United States, 574 U.S. 528 (2015): Case …

    Get Yates v. United States, 574 U.S. 528 (2015), United States Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee.

    Yates v. United States - Harvard Law Review

    Nov 10, 2015 · After a series of catastrophic corporate and accounting frauds in the early 2000s, 1 Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 2 The Act included a provision, codified as …

    Yates v. United States - SCOTUSblog

    38 rows · Nov 5, 2014 · A 2015 Supreme Court case involving the interpretation of a federal statute that criminalizes the destruction of records or objects related to federal investigations. …

    YATES v. UNITED STATES (2015) - Ballotpedia

    Nov 5, 2014 · yates v. UNITED STATES is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 25, 2015. The case was argued before the court on November 5, …

    Analyses of Yates v. United States, 574 U.S. 528 - Casetext

    Jun 19, 2023 · In Yates v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 1074 (2015), the Supreme Court rejected the Department of Justice’s effort to apply 18 U.S.C. §1519 to the destruction of physical evidence …

    Yates v. United States - Case Brief Summary for Law School …

    Fourteen petitioners, all members of the Communist Party of the United States, were convicted under the Smith Act by a jury trial in the United States District Court for the Southern District of …