• Source: Lion-Eating Poet in the Stone Den

"Lion-Eating Poet in the Stone Den" is a short narrative poem written in Literary Chinese, composed of around 92 to 94 characters (depending on the specific version) in which every word is pronounced shi ([ʂɻ̩]) when read in modern Standard Chinese, with only the tones differing.
The poem was written in the 1930s by the Chinese linguist Yuen Ren Chao as a linguistic demonstration. The poem is coherent and grammatical in Literary Chinese, but due to the number of Chinese homophones, it becomes difficult to understand in oral speech. In Mandarin, the poem is incomprehensible when read aloud, since only four syllables cover all the words of the poem. The poem is somewhat more comprehensible when read in other varieties such as Cantonese, in which it has 22 different syllables, or Hokkien, in which it has 15 different syllables.
The poem is an example of a one-syllable article, a form of constrained writing possible in tonal languages such as Mandarin Chinese, where tonal contours expand the range of meaning for a single syllable.




Excerpt


The following is the first six characters of the text in Hanyu Pinyin, Gwoyeu Romatzyh (Chao's own romanization system), and Chinese traditional/simplified characters. Pinyin orthography recommends writing Chinese numbers in Arabic numerals, so the number shí (十) would be written as 10. However, to preserve the homophony in this case, the number 10 has also been spelled out in Pinyin.

Pinyin: Shíshì shīshì Shī Shì
Gwoyeu Romatzyh: Shyrshyh shyshyh Shy Shyh
Traditional Chinese: 石室詩士施氏
Simplified Chinese: 石室诗士施氏
Translation: In a stone den was a poet with the family name Shi...




Explanation


The Chinese languages are tonal—meaning that changes in pitch can change the meaning of words. When written using a romanized script, the poem is an example of Chinese antanaclasis. The poem shows the flexibility of the Chinese language in many ways, including wording, syntax, punctuation, and sentence structures, which gives rise to various explanations.
The poem can be interpreted as an objection to the romanization of Chinese, demonstrating the author's critique of proposals to replace Chinese characters with Latin letters—a move that could potentially lead to the marginalization or elimination of traditional Chinese script. The 20th-century linguist Yuen Ren Chao utilized this poem to illustrate the complexities and unique attributes of the Chinese language, arguing that simplification and romanization would undermine its rich tonal and logographic system.
Yuen Ren Chao's poem illustrates the difficulty of translating the nuanced tones and homophones of Classical Chinese into a romanized script. It contrasts Classical Chinese's literary and formal tradition with the spoken vernacular languages of China, and in doing so implies that attempts to phoneticize the written Chinese language for easier usage may cause it to lose some of its representational capacity.
The written poem is easy to understand for those familiar with Chinese characters, each of which is associated with a distinct core meaning. It remains intelligible in its spoken form in varieties of Chinese other than Mandarin. However, in its romanized form or when spoken in Mandarin, it becomes confusing.




= Evolution

=

The loss of older sound combinations in Chinese over the centuries has greatly increased the number of Chinese homophones. Many words in the passage had distinct sounds in Middle Chinese, but over time, all of the varieties of Chinese have merged and split different sounds. For example, when the same passage is read in Cantonese there are seven distinct syllables—ci, sai, sap, sat, sek, si, ik—in six distinct tone contours, producing 22 distinct character pronunciations. In Southern Min, there are six distinct syllables—se, si, su, sek, sip, sit—in seven distinct tone contours, producing fifteen character pronunciations. Therefore, the passage is barely comprehensible when read aloud in modern Mandarin without context, but easier to understand when read in other Sinitic languages, such as Cantonese.
The same excerpt in other dialects:

Cantonese (Jyutping): Sek6 sat1 si1 si6 si1 si6...
Hokkien (Pe̍h-ōe-jī): Se̍k-sek si-sū Si--sī...
Teochew (Peng'im): zioh8sig4 si1se6 si1si6...
Meixian Hakka (Guangdong Romanization): sak8 sit7 si1 si5 si1 si5...




= Vernacular translation

=
As sound changes over the years merged characters that had different pronunciations, new ways of speaking those concepts emerged. Often, disyllabic words would replace monosyllabic ones. As such, if the same excerpt from Chao's original poem is translated into modern Mandarin, it will not sound as confusing.
The same excerpt written in vernacular Chinese, along with its Pinyin pronunciation:

Traditional characters: 有一位住在石室裡的詩人叫施氏
Simplified characters: 有一位住在石室里的诗人叫施氏
Pinyin: Yǒu yíwèi zhù zài shíshì lǐ de shīrén jiào Shīshì




See also


Homophonic puns in Standard Chinese
List of linguistic example sentences
James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the teacher
Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo
Neko no ko koneko, shishi no ko kojishi
"The Chaos"




References






External links


The Three "NOTs" of Hanyu Pinyin has a similar but different text

Kata Kunci Pencarian:

• James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the teacher
• Penyair memakan singa batu di ruangan berbatu
• Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo
• Lion-Eating Poet in the Stone Den
• Chinese character sounds
• Yuen Ren Chao
• Shi
• The Chaos
• Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo
• Shishi
• Holorime
• Homophone
• Constrained writing