- Source: Lynch v. United States
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fox Sports
- Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa
- Emas Yamashita
- Vanadium
- Perang Dunia II
- Operasi Alsos
- Shirley Chisholm
- Klorfenamin
- Daftar orang Afrika-Amerika dalam Dewan Perwakilan Amerika Serikat
- Lynch v. United States
- Lynching in the United States
- List of lynching victims in the United States
- Lynching of women in the United States
- Lynch v. Donnelly
- Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution
- Schenck v. United States
- United States v. Shipp
- Lynching
- New York Times Co. v. United States
Lynch v. United States, 292 U.S. 571 (1934), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that people can have property interests in contractual agreements with the United States that are protected by due process.Accordingly, Congress cannot reduce expenditures by repudiating and abrogating the contractual obligations of the United States.
Significance
The holding in Lynch was unusual because the actual Contracts Clause explicitly denies states the power to pass any "Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts." Because that does not apply to the federal government, the court placed an analogous right in the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause, which does apply.
The court struck down another act for similar reasons the next year in Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. Radford. However, after the end of the Lochner era, the court relaxed this thread of its jurisprudence.
References
External links
Text of Lynch v. United States, 292 U.S. 571 (1934) is available from: Cornell Findlaw Justia