- Source: Minkowski functional
In mathematics, in the field of functional analysis, a Minkowski functional (after Hermann Minkowski) or gauge function is a function that recovers a notion of distance on a linear space.
If
K
{\displaystyle K}
is a subset of a real or complex vector space
X
,
{\displaystyle X,}
then the Minkowski functional or gauge of
K
{\displaystyle K}
is defined to be the function
p
K
:
X
→
[
0
,
∞
]
,
{\displaystyle p_{K}:X\to [0,\infty ],}
valued in the extended real numbers, defined by
p
K
(
x
)
:=
inf
{
r
∈
R
:
r
>
0
and
x
∈
r
K
}
for every
x
∈
X
,
{\displaystyle p_{K}(x):=\inf\{r\in \mathbb {R} :r>0{\text{ and }}x\in rK\}\quad {\text{ for every }}x\in X,}
where the infimum of the empty set is defined to be positive infinity
∞
{\displaystyle \,\infty \,}
(which is not a real number so that
p
K
(
x
)
{\displaystyle p_{K}(x)}
would then not be real-valued).
The set
K
{\displaystyle K}
is often assumed/picked to have properties, such as being an absorbing disk in
X
,
{\displaystyle X,}
that guarantee that
p
K
{\displaystyle p_{K}}
will be a real-valued seminorm on
X
.
{\displaystyle X.}
In fact, every seminorm
p
{\displaystyle p}
on
X
{\displaystyle X}
is equal to the Minkowski functional (that is,
p
=
p
K
{\displaystyle p=p_{K}}
) of any subset
K
{\displaystyle K}
of
X
{\displaystyle X}
satisfying
{
x
∈
X
:
p
(
x
)
<
1
}
⊆
K
⊆
{
x
∈
X
:
p
(
x
)
≤
1
}
{\displaystyle \{x\in X:p(x)<1\}\subseteq K\subseteq \{x\in X:p(x)\leq 1\}}
(where all three of these sets are necessarily absorbing in
X
{\displaystyle X}
and the first and last are also disks).
Thus every seminorm (which is a function defined by purely algebraic properties) can be associated (non-uniquely) with an absorbing disk (which is a set with certain geometric properties) and conversely, every absorbing disk can be associated with its Minkowski functional (which will necessarily be a seminorm).
These relationships between seminorms, Minkowski functionals, and absorbing disks is a major reason why Minkowski functionals are studied and used in functional analysis.
In particular, through these relationships, Minkowski functionals allow one to "translate" certain geometric properties of a subset of
X
{\displaystyle X}
into certain algebraic properties of a function on
X
.
{\displaystyle X.}
The Minkowski function is always non-negative (meaning
p
K
≥
0
{\displaystyle p_{K}\geq 0}
).
This property of being nonnegative stands in contrast to other classes of functions, such as sublinear functions and real linear functionals, that do allow negative values.
However,
p
K
{\displaystyle p_{K}}
might not be real-valued since for any given
x
∈
X
,
{\displaystyle x\in X,}
the value
p
K
(
x
)
{\displaystyle p_{K}(x)}
is a real number if and only if
{
r
>
0
:
x
∈
r
K
}
{\displaystyle \{r>0:x\in rK\}}
is not empty.
Consequently,
K
{\displaystyle K}
is usually assumed to have properties (such as being absorbing in
X
,
{\displaystyle X,}
for instance) that will guarantee that
p
K
{\displaystyle p_{K}}
is real-valued.
Definition
Let
K
{\displaystyle K}
be a subset of a real or complex vector space
X
.
{\displaystyle X.}
Define the gauge of
K
{\displaystyle K}
or the Minkowski functional associated with or induced by
K
{\displaystyle K}
as being the function
p
K
:
X
→
[
0
,
∞
]
,
{\displaystyle p_{K}:X\to [0,\infty ],}
valued in the extended real numbers, defined by
p
K
(
x
)
:=
inf
{
r
>
0
:
x
∈
r
K
}
,
{\displaystyle p_{K}(x):=\inf\{r>0:x\in rK\},}
where recall that the infimum of the empty set is
∞
{\displaystyle \,\infty \,}
(that is,
inf
∅
=
∞
{\displaystyle \inf \varnothing =\infty }
). Here,
{
r
>
0
:
x
∈
r
K
}
{\displaystyle \{r>0:x\in rK\}}
is shorthand for
{
r
∈
R
:
r
>
0
and
x
∈
r
K
}
.
{\displaystyle \{r\in \mathbb {R} :r>0{\text{ and }}x\in rK\}.}
For any
x
∈
X
,
{\displaystyle x\in X,}
p
K
(
x
)
≠
∞
{\displaystyle p_{K}(x)\neq \infty }
if and only if
{
r
>
0
:
x
∈
r
K
}
{\displaystyle \{r>0:x\in rK\}}
is not empty.
The arithmetic operations on
R
{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} }
can be extended to operate on
±
∞
,
{\displaystyle \pm \infty ,}
where
r
±
∞
:=
0
{\displaystyle {\frac {r}{\pm \infty }}:=0}
for all non-zero real
−
∞
<
r
<
∞
.
{\displaystyle -\infty
The products
0
⋅
∞
{\displaystyle 0\cdot \infty }
and
0
⋅
−
∞
{\displaystyle 0\cdot -\infty }
remain undefined.
Some conditions making a gauge real-valued
In the field of convex analysis, the map
p
K
{\displaystyle p_{K}}
taking on the value of
∞
{\displaystyle \,\infty \,}
is not necessarily an issue.
However, in functional analysis
p
K
{\displaystyle p_{K}}
is almost always real-valued (that is, to never take on the value of
∞
{\displaystyle \,\infty \,}
), which happens if and only if the set
{
r
>
0
:
x
∈
r
K
}
{\displaystyle \{r>0:x\in rK\}}
is non-empty for every
x
∈
X
.
{\displaystyle x\in X.}
In order for
p
K
{\displaystyle p_{K}}
to be real-valued, it suffices for the origin of
X
{\displaystyle X}
to belong to the algebraic interior or core of
K
{\displaystyle K}
in
X
.
{\displaystyle X.}
If
K
{\displaystyle K}
is absorbing in
X
,
{\displaystyle X,}
where recall that this implies that
0
∈
K
,
{\displaystyle 0\in K,}
then the origin belongs to the algebraic interior of
K
{\displaystyle K}
in
X
{\displaystyle X}
and thus
p
K
{\displaystyle p_{K}}
is real-valued.
Characterizations of when
p
K
{\displaystyle p_{K}}
is real-valued are given below.
Motivating examples
Example 1
Consider a normed vector space
(
X
,
‖
⋅
‖
)
,
{\displaystyle (X,\|\,\cdot \,\|),}
with the norm
‖
⋅
‖
{\displaystyle \|\,\cdot \,\|}
and let
U
:=
{
x
∈
X
:
‖
x
‖
≤
1
}
{\displaystyle U:=\{x\in X:\|x\|\leq 1\}}
be the unit ball in
X
.
{\displaystyle X.}
Then for every
x
∈
X
,
{\displaystyle x\in X,}
‖
x
‖
=
p
U
(
x
)
.
{\displaystyle \|x\|=p_{U}(x).}
Thus the Minkowski functional
p
U
{\displaystyle p_{U}}
is just the norm on
X
.
{\displaystyle X.}
Example 2
Let
X
{\displaystyle X}
be a vector space without topology with underlying scalar field
K
.
{\displaystyle \mathbb {K} .}
Let
f
:
X
→
K
{\displaystyle f:X\to \mathbb {K} }
be any linear functional on
X
{\displaystyle X}
(not necessarily continuous).
Fix
a
>
0.
{\displaystyle a>0.}
Let
K
{\displaystyle K}
be the set
K
:=
{
x
∈
X
:
|
f
(
x
)
|
≤
a
}
{\displaystyle K:=\{x\in X:|f(x)|\leq a\}}
and let
p
K
{\displaystyle p_{K}}
be the Minkowski functional of
K
.
{\displaystyle K.}
Then
p
K
(
x
)
=
1
a
|
f
(
x
)
|
for all
x
∈
X
.
{\displaystyle p_{K}(x)={\frac {1}{a}}|f(x)|\quad {\text{ for all }}x\in X.}
The function
p
K
{\displaystyle p_{K}}
has the following properties:
It is subadditive:
p
K
(
x
+
y
)
≤
p
K
(
x
)
+
p
K
(
y
)
.
{\displaystyle p_{K}(x+y)\leq p_{K}(x)+p_{K}(y).}
It is absolutely homogeneous:
p
K
(
s
x
)
=
|
s
|
p
K
(
x
)
{\displaystyle p_{K}(sx)=|s|p_{K}(x)}
for all scalars
s
.
{\displaystyle s.}
It is nonnegative:
p
K
≥
0.
{\displaystyle p_{K}\geq 0.}
Therefore,
p
K
{\displaystyle p_{K}}
is a seminorm on
X
,
{\displaystyle X,}
with an induced topology.
This is characteristic of Minkowski functionals defined via "nice" sets.
There is a one-to-one correspondence between seminorms and the Minkowski functional given by such sets.
What is meant precisely by "nice" is discussed in the section below.
Notice that, in contrast to a stronger requirement for a norm,
p
K
(
x
)
=
0
{\displaystyle p_{K}(x)=0}
need not imply
x
=
0.
{\displaystyle x=0.}
In the above example, one can take a nonzero
x
{\displaystyle x}
from the kernel of
f
.
{\displaystyle f.}
Consequently, the resulting topology need not be Hausdorff.
Common conditions guaranteeing gauges are seminorms
To guarantee that
p
K
(
0
)
=
0
,
{\displaystyle p_{K}(0)=0,}
it will henceforth be assumed that
0
∈
K
.
{\displaystyle 0\in K.}
In order for
p
K
{\displaystyle p_{K}}
to be a seminorm, it suffices for
K
{\displaystyle K}
to be a disk (that is, convex and balanced) and absorbing in
X
,
{\displaystyle X,}
which are the most common assumption placed on
K
.
{\displaystyle K.}
More generally, if
K
{\displaystyle K}
is convex and the origin belongs to the algebraic interior of
K
,
{\displaystyle K,}
then
p
K
{\displaystyle p_{K}}
is a nonnegative sublinear functional on
X
,
{\displaystyle X,}
which implies in particular that it is subadditive and positive homogeneous.
If
K
{\displaystyle K}
is absorbing in
X
{\displaystyle X}
then
p
[
0
,
1
]
K
{\displaystyle p_{[0,1]K}}
is positive homogeneous, meaning that
p
[
0
,
1
]
K
(
s
x
)
=
s
p
[
0
,
1
]
K
(
x
)
{\displaystyle p_{[0,1]K}(sx)=sp_{[0,1]K}(x)}
for all real
s
≥
0
,
{\displaystyle s\geq 0,}
where
[
0
,
1
]
K
=
{
t
k
:
t
∈
[
0
,
1
]
,
k
∈
K
}
.
{\displaystyle [0,1]K=\{tk:t\in [0,1],k\in K\}.}
If
q
{\displaystyle q}
is a nonnegative real-valued function on
X
{\displaystyle X}
that is positive homogeneous, then the sets
U
:=
{
x
∈
X
:
q
(
x
)
<
1
}
{\displaystyle U:=\{x\in X:q(x)<1\}}
and
D
:=
{
x
∈
X
:
q
(
x
)
≤
1
}
{\displaystyle D:=\{x\in X:q(x)\leq 1\}}
satisfy
[
0
,
1
]
U
=
U
{\displaystyle [0,1]U=U}
and
[
0
,
1
]
D
=
D
;
{\displaystyle [0,1]D=D;}
if in addition
q
{\displaystyle q}
is absolutely homogeneous then both
U
{\displaystyle U}
and
D
{\displaystyle D}
are balanced.
= Gauges of absorbing disks
=Arguably the most common requirements placed on a set
K
{\displaystyle K}
to guarantee that
p
K
{\displaystyle p_{K}}
is a seminorm are that
K
{\displaystyle K}
be an absorbing disk in
X
.
{\displaystyle X.}
Due to how common these assumptions are, the properties of a Minkowski functional
p
K
{\displaystyle p_{K}}
when
K
{\displaystyle K}
is an absorbing disk will now be investigated.
Since all of the results mentioned above made few (if any) assumptions on
K
,
{\displaystyle K,}
they can be applied in this special case.
= Algebraic properties
=Let
X
{\displaystyle X}
be a real or complex vector space and let
K
{\displaystyle K}
be an absorbing disk in
X
.
{\displaystyle X.}
p
K
{\displaystyle p_{K}}
is a seminorm on
X
.
{\displaystyle X.}
p
K
{\displaystyle p_{K}}
is a norm on
X
{\displaystyle X}
if and only if
K
{\displaystyle K}
does not contain a non-trivial vector subspace.
p
s
K
=
1
|
s
|
p
K
{\displaystyle p_{sK}={\frac {1}{|s|}}p_{K}}
for any scalar
s
≠
0.
{\displaystyle s\neq 0.}
If
J
{\displaystyle J}
is an absorbing disk in
X
{\displaystyle X}
and
J
⊆
K
{\displaystyle J\subseteq K}
then
p
K
≤
p
J
.
{\displaystyle p_{K}\leq p_{J}.}
If
K
{\displaystyle K}
is a set satisfying
{
x
∈
X
:
p
(
x
)
<
1
}
⊆
K
⊆
{
x
∈
X
:
p
(
x
)
≤
1
}
{\displaystyle \{x\in X:p(x)<1\}\;\subseteq \;K\;\subseteq \;\{x\in X:p(x)\leq 1\}}
then
K
{\displaystyle K}
is absorbing in
X
{\displaystyle X}
and
p
=
p
K
,
{\displaystyle p=p_{K},}
where
p
K
{\displaystyle p_{K}}
is the Minkowski functional associated with
K
;
{\displaystyle K;}
that is, it is the gauge of
K
.
{\displaystyle K.}
In particular, if
K
{\displaystyle K}
is as above and
q
{\displaystyle q}
is any seminorm on
X
,
{\displaystyle X,}
then
q
=
p
{\displaystyle q=p}
if and only if
{
x
∈
X
:
q
(
x
)
<
1
}
⊆
K
⊆
{
x
∈
X
:
q
(
x
)
≤
1
}
.
{\displaystyle \{x\in X:q(x)<1\}\;\subseteq \;K\;\subseteq \;\{x\in X:q(x)\leq 1\}.}
If
x
∈
X
{\displaystyle x\in X}
satisfies
p
K
(
x
)
<
1
{\displaystyle p_{K}(x)<1}
then
x
∈
K
.
{\displaystyle x\in K.}
= Topological properties
=Assume that
X
{\displaystyle X}
is a (real or complex) topological vector space (TVS) (not necessarily Hausdorff or locally convex) and let
K
{\displaystyle K}
be an absorbing disk in
X
.
{\displaystyle X.}
Then
Int
X
K
⊆
{
x
∈
X
:
p
K
(
x
)
<
1
}
⊆
K
⊆
{
x
∈
X
:
p
K
(
x
)
≤
1
}
⊆
Cl
X
K
,
{\displaystyle \operatorname {Int} _{X}K\;\subseteq \;\{x\in X:p_{K}(x)<1\}\;\subseteq \;K\;\subseteq \;\{x\in X:p_{K}(x)\leq 1\}\;\subseteq \;\operatorname {Cl} _{X}K,}
where
Int
X
K
{\displaystyle \operatorname {Int} _{X}K}
is the topological interior and
Cl
X
K
{\displaystyle \operatorname {Cl} _{X}K}
is the topological closure of
K
{\displaystyle K}
in
X
.
{\displaystyle X.}
Importantly, it was not assumed that
p
K
{\displaystyle p_{K}}
was continuous nor was it assumed that
K
{\displaystyle K}
had any topological properties.
Moreover, the Minkowski functional
p
K
{\displaystyle p_{K}}
is continuous if and only if
K
{\displaystyle K}
is a neighborhood of the origin in
X
.
{\displaystyle X.}
If
p
K
{\displaystyle p_{K}}
is continuous then
Int
X
K
=
{
x
∈
X
:
p
K
(
x
)
<
1
}
and
Cl
X
K
=
{
x
∈
X
:
p
K
(
x
)
≤
1
}
.
{\displaystyle \operatorname {Int} _{X}K=\{x\in X:p_{K}(x)<1\}\quad {\text{ and }}\quad \operatorname {Cl} _{X}K=\{x\in X:p_{K}(x)\leq 1\}.}
Minimal requirements on the set
This section will investigate the most general case of the gauge of any subset
K
{\displaystyle K}
of
X
.
{\displaystyle X.}
The more common special case where
K
{\displaystyle K}
is assumed to be an absorbing disk in
X
{\displaystyle X}
was discussed above.
= Properties
=All results in this section may be applied to the case where
K
{\displaystyle K}
is an absorbing disk.
Throughout,
K
{\displaystyle K}
is any subset of
X
.
{\displaystyle X.}
= Examples
=If
L
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {L}}}
is a non-empty collection of subsets of
X
{\displaystyle X}
then
p
∪
L
(
x
)
=
inf
{
p
L
(
x
)
:
L
∈
L
}
{\displaystyle p_{\cup {\mathcal {L}}}(x)=\inf \left\{p_{L}(x):L\in {\mathcal {L}}\right\}}
for all
x
∈
X
,
{\displaystyle x\in X,}
where
∪
L
=
def
⋃
L
∈
L
L
.
{\displaystyle \cup {\mathcal {L}}~{\stackrel {\scriptscriptstyle {\text{def}}}{=}}~{\textstyle \bigcup \limits _{L\in {\mathcal {L}}}}L.}
Thus
p
K
∪
L
(
x
)
=
min
{
p
K
(
x
)
,
p
L
(
x
)
}
{\displaystyle p_{K\cup L}(x)=\min \left\{p_{K}(x),p_{L}(x)\right\}}
for all
x
∈
X
.
{\displaystyle x\in X.}
If
L
{\displaystyle {\mathcal {L}}}
is a non-empty collection of subsets of
X
{\displaystyle X}
and
I
⊆
X
{\displaystyle I\subseteq X}
satisfies
{
x
∈
X
:
p
L
(
x
)
<
1
for all
L
∈
L
}
⊆
I
⊆
{
x
∈
X
:
p
L
(
x
)
≤
1
for all
L
∈
L
}
{\displaystyle \left\{x\in X:p_{L}(x)<1{\text{ for all }}L\in {\mathcal {L}}\right\}\quad \subseteq \quad I\quad \subseteq \quad \left\{x\in X:p_{L}(x)\leq 1{\text{ for all }}L\in {\mathcal {L}}\right\}}
then
p
I
(
x
)
=
sup
{
p
L
(
x
)
:
L
∈
L
}
{\displaystyle p_{I}(x)=\sup \left\{p_{L}(x):L\in {\mathcal {L}}\right\}}
for all
x
∈
X
.
{\displaystyle x\in X.}
The following examples show that the containment
(
0
,
R
]
K
⊆
⋂
e
>
0
(
0
,
R
+
e
)
K
{\displaystyle (0,R]K\;\subseteq \;{\textstyle \bigcap \limits _{e>0}}(0,R+e)K}
could be proper.
Example: If
R
=
0
{\displaystyle R=0}
and
K
=
X
{\displaystyle K=X}
then
(
0
,
R
]
K
=
(
0
,
0
]
X
=
∅
X
=
∅
{\displaystyle (0,R]K=(0,0]X=\varnothing X=\varnothing }
but
⋂
e
>
0
(
0
,
e
)
K
=
⋂
e
>
0
X
=
X
,
{\displaystyle {\textstyle \bigcap \limits _{e>0}}(0,e)K={\textstyle \bigcap \limits _{e>0}}X=X,}
which shows that its possible for
(
0
,
R
]
K
{\displaystyle (0,R]K}
to be a proper subset of
⋂
e
>
0
(
0
,
R
+
e
)
K
{\displaystyle {\textstyle \bigcap \limits _{e>0}}(0,R+e)K}
when
R
=
0.
{\displaystyle R=0.}
◼
{\displaystyle \blacksquare }
The next example shows that the containment can be proper when
R
=
1
;
{\displaystyle R=1;}
the example may be generalized to any real
R
>
0.
{\displaystyle R>0.}
Assuming that
[
0
,
1
]
K
⊆
K
,
{\displaystyle [0,1]K\subseteq K,}
the following example is representative of how it happens that
x
∈
X
{\displaystyle x\in X}
satisfies
p
K
(
x
)
=
1
{\displaystyle p_{K}(x)=1}
but
x
∉
(
0
,
1
]
K
.
{\displaystyle x\not \in (0,1]K.}
Example: Let
x
∈
X
{\displaystyle x\in X}
be non-zero and let
K
=
[
0
,
1
)
x
{\displaystyle K=[0,1)x}
so that
[
0
,
1
]
K
=
K
{\displaystyle [0,1]K=K}
and
x
∉
K
.
{\displaystyle x\not \in K.}
From
x
∉
(
0
,
1
)
K
=
K
{\displaystyle x\not \in (0,1)K=K}
it follows that
p
K
(
x
)
≥
1.
{\displaystyle p_{K}(x)\geq 1.}
That
p
K
(
x
)
≤
1
{\displaystyle p_{K}(x)\leq 1}
follows from observing that for every
e
>
0
,
{\displaystyle e>0,}
(
0
,
1
+
e
)
K
=
[
0
,
1
+
e
)
(
[
0
,
1
)
x
)
=
[
0
,
1
+
e
)
x
,
{\displaystyle (0,1+e)K=[0,1+e)([0,1)x)=[0,1+e)x,}
which contains
x
.
{\displaystyle x.}
Thus
p
K
(
x
)
=
1
{\displaystyle p_{K}(x)=1}
and
x
∈
⋂
e
>
0
(
0
,
1
+
e
)
K
.
{\displaystyle x\in {\textstyle \bigcap \limits _{e>0}}(0,1+e)K.}
However,
(
0
,
1
]
K
=
(
0
,
1
]
(
[
0
,
1
)
x
)
=
[
0
,
1
)
x
=
K
{\displaystyle (0,1]K=(0,1]([0,1)x)=[0,1)x=K}
so that
x
∉
(
0
,
1
]
K
,
{\displaystyle x\not \in (0,1]K,}
as desired.
◼
{\displaystyle \blacksquare }
= Positive homogeneity characterizes Minkowski functionals
=The next theorem shows that Minkowski functionals are exactly those functions
f
:
X
→
[
0
,
∞
]
{\displaystyle f:X\to [0,\infty ]}
that have a certain purely algebraic property that is commonly encountered.
This theorem can be extended to characterize certain classes of
[
−
∞
,
∞
]
{\displaystyle [-\infty ,\infty ]}
-valued maps (for example, real-valued sublinear functions) in terms of Minkowski functionals.
For instance, it can be used to describe how every real homogeneous function
f
:
X
→
R
{\displaystyle f:X\to \mathbb {R} }
(such as linear functionals) can be written in terms of a unique Minkowski functional having a certain property.
= Characterizing Minkowski functionals on star sets
== Characterizing Minkowski functionals that are seminorms
=In this next theorem, which follows immediately from the statements above,
K
{\displaystyle K}
is not assumed to be absorbing in
X
{\displaystyle X}
and instead, it is deduced that
(
0
,
1
)
K
{\displaystyle (0,1)K}
is absorbing when
p
K
{\displaystyle p_{K}}
is a seminorm. It is also not assumed that
K
{\displaystyle K}
is balanced (which is a property that
K
{\displaystyle K}
is often required to have); in its place is the weaker condition that
(
0
,
1
)
s
K
⊆
(
0
,
1
)
K
{\displaystyle (0,1)sK\subseteq (0,1)K}
for all scalars
s
{\displaystyle s}
satisfying
|
s
|
=
1.
{\displaystyle |s|=1.}
The common requirement that
K
{\displaystyle K}
be convex is also weakened to only requiring that
(
0
,
1
)
K
{\displaystyle (0,1)K}
be convex.
= Positive sublinear functions and Minkowski functionals
=It may be shown that a real-valued subadditive function
f
:
X
→
R
{\displaystyle f:X\to \mathbb {R} }
on an arbitrary topological vector space
X
{\displaystyle X}
is continuous at the origin if and only if it is uniformly continuous, where if in addition
f
{\displaystyle f}
is nonnegative, then
f
{\displaystyle f}
is continuous if and only if
V
:=
{
x
∈
X
:
f
(
x
)
<
1
}
{\displaystyle V:=\{x\in X:f(x)<1\}}
is an open neighborhood in
X
.
{\displaystyle X.}
If
f
:
X
→
R
{\displaystyle f:X\to \mathbb {R} }
is subadditive and satisfies
f
(
0
)
=
0
,
{\displaystyle f(0)=0,}
then
f
{\displaystyle f}
is continuous if and only if its absolute value
|
f
|
:
X
→
[
0
,
∞
)
{\displaystyle |f|:X\to [0,\infty )}
is continuous.
A nonnegative sublinear function is a nonnegative homogeneous function
f
:
X
→
[
0
,
∞
)
{\displaystyle f:X\to [0,\infty )}
that satisfies the triangle inequality.
It follows immediately from the results below that for such a function
f
,
{\displaystyle f,}
if
V
:=
{
x
∈
X
:
f
(
x
)
<
1
}
{\displaystyle V:=\{x\in X:f(x)<1\}}
then
f
=
p
V
.
{\displaystyle f=p_{V}.}
Given
K
⊆
X
,
{\displaystyle K\subseteq X,}
the Minkowski functional
p
K
{\displaystyle p_{K}}
is a sublinear function if and only if it is real-valued and subadditive, which is happens if and only if
(
0
,
∞
)
K
=
X
{\displaystyle (0,\infty )K=X}
and
(
0
,
1
)
K
{\displaystyle (0,1)K}
is convex.
Correspondence between open convex sets and positive continuous sublinear functions
See also
Asymmetric norm – Generalization of the concept of a norm
Auxiliary normed space
Cauchy's functional equation – Functional equation
Finest locally convex topology – A vector space with a topology defined by convex open setsPages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
Finsler manifold – Generalization of Riemannian manifolds
Hadwiger's theorem – Theorem in integral geometry
Hugo Hadwiger – Swiss mathematician (1908–1981)
Locally convex topological vector space – A vector space with a topology defined by convex open sets
Morphological image processing – Theory and technique for handling geometrical structuresPages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
Norm (mathematics) – Length in a vector space
Seminorm – Mathematical function
Topological vector space – Vector space with a notion of nearness
Notes
References
Berberian, Sterling K. (1974). Lectures in Functional Analysis and Operator Theory. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Vol. 15. New York: Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-90081-0. OCLC 878109401.
Bourbaki, Nicolas (1987) [1981]. Topological Vector Spaces: Chapters 1–5. Éléments de mathématique. Translated by Eggleston, H.G.; Madan, S. Berlin New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 3-540-13627-4. OCLC 17499190.
Conway, John (1990). A course in functional analysis. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Vol. 96 (2nd ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-0-387-97245-9. OCLC 21195908.
Diestel, Joe (2008). The Metric Theory of Tensor Products: Grothendieck's Résumé Revisited. Vol. 16. Providence, R.I.: American Mathematical Society. ISBN 9781470424831. OCLC 185095773.
Dineen, Seán (1981). Complex Analysis in Locally Convex Spaces. North-Holland Mathematics Studies. Vol. 57. Amsterdam New York New York: North-Holland Pub. Co., Elsevier Science Pub. Co. ISBN 978-0-08-087168-4. OCLC 16549589.
Dunford, Nelson; Schwartz, Jacob T. (1988). Linear Operators. Pure and applied mathematics. Vol. 1. New York: Wiley-Interscience. ISBN 978-0-471-60848-6. OCLC 18412261.
Edwards, Robert E. (1995). Functional Analysis: Theory and Applications. New York: Dover Publications. ISBN 978-0-486-68143-6. OCLC 30593138.
Grothendieck, Alexander (1973). Topological Vector Spaces. Translated by Chaljub, Orlando. New York: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers. ISBN 978-0-677-30020-7. OCLC 886098.
Hogbe-Nlend, Henri (1977). Bornologies and Functional Analysis: Introductory Course on the Theory of Duality Topology-Bornology and its use in Functional Analysis. North-Holland Mathematics Studies. Vol. 26. Amsterdam New York New York: North Holland. ISBN 978-0-08-087137-0. MR 0500064. OCLC 316549583.
Hogbe-Nlend, Henri; Moscatelli, V. B. (1981). Nuclear and Conuclear Spaces: Introductory Course on Nuclear and Conuclear Spaces in the Light of the Duality "topology-bornology". North-Holland Mathematics Studies. Vol. 52. Amsterdam New York New York: North Holland. ISBN 978-0-08-087163-9. OCLC 316564345.
Husain, Taqdir; Khaleelulla, S. M. (1978). Barrelledness in Topological and Ordered Vector Spaces. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Vol. 692. Berlin, New York, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-540-09096-0. OCLC 4493665.
Keller, Hans (1974). Differential Calculus in Locally Convex Spaces. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Vol. 417. Berlin New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-540-06962-1. OCLC 1103033.
Khaleelulla, S. M. (1982). Counterexamples in Topological Vector Spaces. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Vol. 936. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-540-11565-6. OCLC 8588370.
Kubrusly, Carlos S. (2011). The Elements of Operator Theory (Second ed.). Boston: Birkhäuser. ISBN 978-0-8176-4998-2. OCLC 710154895.
Jarchow, Hans (1981). Locally convex spaces. Stuttgart: B.G. Teubner. ISBN 978-3-519-02224-4. OCLC 8210342.
Köthe, Gottfried (1983) [1969]. Topological Vector Spaces I. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. Vol. 159. Translated by Garling, D.J.H. New York: Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-3-642-64988-2. MR 0248498. OCLC 840293704.
Köthe, Gottfried (1979). Topological Vector Spaces II. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften. Vol. 237. New York: Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-0-387-90400-9. OCLC 180577972.
Narici, Lawrence; Beckenstein, Edward (2011). Topological Vector Spaces. Pure and applied mathematics (Second ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. ISBN 978-1584888666. OCLC 144216834.
Pietsch, Albrecht (1979). Nuclear Locally Convex Spaces. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. Vol. 66 (Second ed.). Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-0-387-05644-9. OCLC 539541.
Robertson, Alex P.; Robertson, Wendy J. (1980). Topological Vector Spaces. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics. Vol. 53. Cambridge England: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-29882-7. OCLC 589250.
Rudin, Walter (1991). Functional Analysis. International Series in Pure and Applied Mathematics. Vol. 8 (Second ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Science/Engineering/Math. ISBN 978-0-07-054236-5. OCLC 21163277.
Thompson, Anthony C. (1996). Minkowski Geometry. Encyclopedia of Mathematics and Its Applications. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-40472-X.
Schaefer, Helmut H.; Wolff, Manfred P. (1999). Topological Vector Spaces. GTM. Vol. 8 (Second ed.). New York, NY: Springer New York Imprint Springer. ISBN 978-1-4612-7155-0. OCLC 840278135.
Schechter, Eric (1996). Handbook of Analysis and Its Foundations. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-622760-4. OCLC 175294365.
Schaefer, H. H. (1999). Topological Vector Spaces. New York, NY: Springer New York Imprint Springer. ISBN 978-1-4612-7155-0. OCLC 840278135.
Swartz, Charles (1992). An introduction to Functional Analysis. New York: M. Dekker. ISBN 978-0-8247-8643-4. OCLC 24909067.
Trèves, François (2006) [1967]. Topological Vector Spaces, Distributions and Kernels. Mineola, N.Y.: Dover Publications. ISBN 978-0-486-45352-1. OCLC 853623322.
Wilansky, Albert (2013). Modern Methods in Topological Vector Spaces. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications, Inc. ISBN 978-0-486-49353-4. OCLC 849801114.
Wong, Yau-Chuen (1979). Schwartz Spaces, Nuclear Spaces, and Tensor Products. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Vol. 726. Berlin New York: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-540-09513-2. OCLC 5126158.
Further reading
F. Simeski, A.M.P. Boelens and M. Ihme. Modeling Adsorption in Silica Pores via Minkowski Functionals and Molecular Electrostatic Moments. Energies 13 (22) 5976 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/en13225976
Kata Kunci Pencarian:
- Ukuran (matematika)
- Norma (matematika)
- Pertidaksamaan Cauchy–Schwarz
- Daftar masalah matematika yang belum terpecahkan
- Ruang vektor
- Minkowski functional
- Seminorm
- Minkowski
- Sublinear function
- Minkowski norm
- Hermann Minkowski
- Minkowski space
- Minkowski distance
- List of things named after Hermann Minkowski
- Norm (mathematics)